Ricardo Tosto Knows About Brazilian Law

More than anyone, Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho knows talking about law is always a complicated thing, especially if you are dealing with Brazilian laws, which are quite varied and be that we are talking about the Constitution, which commands throughout the national territory.

Luckily, many of these bizarre Brazilian laws have already fallen and gone. Otherwise, as you will have the opportunity to perceive yourself, many people in this country would be very involved!

1. Law against condoms

The Municipal Decree 82/97, of Bocaiúva do Sul, in Paraná, is part of the list of more bizarre Brazilian laws already created until then. The law, which came into force November 19, 1997, says that the sale of condoms and contraceptives is banned in the city.

This is because the number of inhabitants in the city had not grown for some years and the municipality was being harmed in the transfer of federal funds. But, of course, the crazy thing was the biggest problem and the law was revoked in 24 hours.

2. Municipal “Discoporto

Another pearl of Brazilian municipal laws is 1840/95, from Barra do Garças, in Mato Grosso. It came into force on September 5, 1995. It was at this time that the then present of the municipality, of 55 thousand inhabitants, had the idea of building a discoporto, if that exists.

He reserved, for the descent of flying saucers, an area of 5 hectares in Serra do Roncador, known for being the refuge of several scholars of ufology. But the project has never gone down, at least until today.

3. Law against masks

Because of the Municipal Law 1790/68, of São Luíz, in Maranhão, the city was seen on the prohibition of the use of masks at parties. The only exception to the Law, created during the administration of Mayor Epitacio, was Carnival. Unless, of course, the users of masks got a special license granted by the city hall.

This, which is certainly among the most crazy Brazilian laws so far, was created on May 12, 1968, but eventually became “death letter.” The then mayor, to defend his craziness, said the measure helped identify potential criminals.

Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho is considered among the greatest leader-strategists in the Brazil legal industry. Ricardo Tosto began his career within an independent office Ricardo Tosto eventually moved on to work for one of the best corporate litigation firms in the region. Ricardo Tosto went on to begin his own law firm that became one of Brazils largest.

Learn More: globoplay.globo.com/v/3436363/

Karl Heideck: The Most Sort-After Litigation Attorney

Karl Heideck - Attorney at Law
Karl Heideck – Attorney at Law

Litigation is a civil lawsuit where a plaintiff takes a defendant to court in an attempt to get money damages for any injuries that were caused knowingly or unknowingly by the defendant. In most cases, the plaintiff tries to prove negligence actions of the defendants are what caused him any injury or loss.

A civil lawsuit arises when there is a dispute between two parties and any informal reconciliation is deemed impossible. The process goes through three or sometimes four processes namely; Pleading, Discovery, Trial, and to some extent and Appeal.

The pleading process gives both parties involved in the lawsuit an opportunity to tell their side of the story. The plaintiff starts by filling a complaint to the court entailing what the defendant did or failed to do that ended up causing harm to the plaintiff. The defendant is also given ample time to respond to the complaint by telling their side of the story.

The discovery process involves the collection of information by both parties that will help their defense. The process involves interviewing witnesses and collecting information from each other. When both sides are confident and satisfied with their evidence, the process moves to trial.

The trial process gives both parties a chance to present their case and argument in front of a judge or jury. Before the trial, each party provides a ‘brief’ to the judge, which is a document that outlines the evidence and argument that will be presented during the trial.

Sometimes the two parties might avoid trial by settling the matter outside the courtroom. In the case of a completed trial, any party may appeal for another trial if they feel that the outcome of the case wasn’t what they were expecting.

A litigator is an attorney that guides his/her client through the entire litigation process. To be a litigator, one has to have a clear understanding of the civil law.

Like Karl Heideck on Facebook.

A good example of a litigator is Karl Heideck. A Graduate of James E. Beasley School of Law at the Temple University, he has gone ahead and worked in several law firms and helped countless clients to negotiate their litigation process. Karl Heideck is considered to be among the most sort-after litigation attorneys.

Click Here to learn more about Heideck.

His ambition to help out his clients is what sets him apart from the rest. Karl Heideck’s experience in civil lawsuit cases has equipped him with relevant skills to help anyone get the most out of their case. When asked about his motivation, Karl Heideck mentioned the look of his clients’ face when they win the case is what drives him.

Learn more about Karl Heideck: http://www.spokeo.com/Karl-Heideck

SEC Whistleblowers Earning a Fortune

Whistleblowing could earn a fortune. The is because of some of the recent legislations that have been put in place that see to it that whistleblowers blowers get adequate protection and a good amount of pay for the information they provide. Any information that involves violation of security laws, if original, can be submitted to the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in turn, the whistleblowers get paid depending on the whether a case is successfully built from the information and on monetary sanctions that will be collected in the long run from a successful case.

This reform got enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act reforms which were implemented by the United States Congress back in 2010. This caused a major change in the U.S. financial regulating sector and could be compared to the Great Depression. It is under these reforms that the whistleblower program was founded. The program aims to encourage people to report any violation involving federal security laws to SEC and in turn, be paid and earn employment protections.

It seems like Labaton Sucharow, a large law firm in the U.S., totally embraced this idea as they went on to form a practice that solely focuses on protecting Sec whistleblowers. They teamed which highly qualified SEC whistleblowers lawyers and several other supporting staff such as experienced accountants and financial analysts, all in a bid to support the SEC whistleblowers attorneys in their line of duty. Jordan A. Thomas, who used to be a major player in SEC and who is currently working for the law firm seems to have sped up the setting up of the SEC whistleblowers lawyers as he formed part of the team that proposed, drafted and implemented the whistleblower program.

The current rule is that an eligible whistleblower should be paid 10% to 30% of the money that SEC gets from the sanctions of a successful case and the amount is only payable if the sanction is not less than a million dollars. If the above conditions are met, then the whistleblower gets to be credited with awards too. The whistleblowers are further protected by the Dodd-Frank Act which states that those who are reported to SEC should not in any way be perceived to be seeking revenge.

Largest SEC Settlement In US History Won By Leading Firm

You’re not fighting by yourself when you’re trying to win a Securities Exchange Commission claim against your employer. They are there to get you the compensation that you deserve. A whistleblower is entitled to 10-30% of the sanctions that are collected by the SEC. The Dodd-Frank act was implemented to enforce these and other laws. As a whistleblower you are expected to turn over information that will aid substantially in the investigation. Most people don’t understated the importance of keeping your privacy during the proceedings to avoid being blacklisted. There are a number of people that are helped annually with competent legal representation.

Labaton Sucharow was one of the very first legal professionals to dedicate his entire practice to SEC laws. There are a number of people that want to fight a corporation that is responsible for investors money, but they don’t know how to move forward with their claim. Sucharow goes through the extensive laws with his clients and tells them where they stand with their case. Sucharow was mentioned intensely in a PRN Newswire article for being a prolific attorney that has won the highest SEC whistleblower settlement in U.S. history. His client received a record unspecified amount in the recent article reported by the news giant.

A qualified SEC whistleblower attorney will give you a free consultation and won’t collect unless you win your claim. You can do research in your local directory to find out more information about how they can work for you. They want to ensure that you get the compensation that you deserve even if another agency also decides to sue and collects sanctions.

A SEC whistleblower lawyer like Sucharow has extensive knowledge on SEC laws. From the beginning he has been responsible for implementing and upgrading these laws to meet the needs of the clients. He has taken the initiative to ensure that you don’t get dubbed by your employer. There are a number of resources available through your legal counsel that will help you win your claim. Investors are tired of their stocks being stolen because of the illegal deeds of someone working in the financial sector. Join a legal professional today to discuss the potential to sue your employer as a whistleblower.

SEC Whistleblower Offers Employees Complete Protection

Once the Protection Act of 2010 was enacted by Congress, it leveled the playing field between employees and employers concerning securities fraud in the workplace. Those employees who were being threatened they would lose their jobs if they reported such wrongdoings were now in the position to not only report their employers anonymously, they would be rewarded financially if the charges stuck.

With the full backing of the SEC, whistleblowers were now able to find safe harbor when reporting their employers fir committing fraud against the securities commission. The financial incentive not only made it easier for these employees to report fraud, it really began to put the pressure back on the employers who became fearful they would be exposed anonymously because of the huge rewards being offered.

Leading the charge in the efforts to bring these employers to justice and exonerate the employees who were being forced to keep things quite was the law firm of Labaton Sucharow. The decided that the Whistleblower Representation Practice was serious business, and they dedicated their services to bringing these employers to trial. The law firm committed unlimited resources by way of highly experienced forensic accountants, financial analysts, and seasoned investigators, who all worked as a team to provide employees a resource to safely report security fraud without the risk of losing their only source of income.

One of the reasons more employees found it easier to now come forward was the fact that according the whistleblower program, the SEC paid eligible employees who reported the fraud a whopping 10-30% of the money that was collected as a result of enforcing the actions that allowed the firm to collect $1 million or more. This reward could now provide financial security for those who have been fearfully living under the thumb of employers and having to be witness illegal activities daily.

The Dodd-Frank Act allows more employees to bring allegations of security fraud to light, while prohibiting retaliation by any employer against whistleblowers who filed these crimes with a lawyer or directly to the SEC. These employees were also afforded the chance to report completely anonymous. This now allowed them to work without suspicion by the employer that they were being investigated by the SEC.